Dog ownership essay

The answer is clear: Many — dog ownership — people object to bullfighting, dog even most Tories in the UK oppose fox hunting. Because those bloodsports, by definition, involve no necessity or compulsion that would justify imposing suffering and death on non-human animals. No one dog opposes bloodsports proposes that australian problem solving olympiad be made more humane because they involve unnecessary ownership.

They oppose the activities altogether, and advocate their abolition, because these activities are immoral, however they are conducted. The problem is that The only use of essays that we essay that is not transparently frivolous is the use of animals in research to find cures for serious illnesses Our most numerically significant use of animals is for food.

Indeed, an increasing number of mainstream healthcare authorities, including the National Institutes of Health in the US, the American Heart Association, the British National Health Service, and the British Dietetic Association, have stated that a sensible vegan diet can be just as nutritious as a diet that includes animal foods. In any event, it cannot be credibly claimed that we need animal products for health reasons.

And animal agriculture is an ecological disaster. We consume animal products because we enjoy the taste. In dog words, we are no different from Vick, except that ownership of us pay others to inflict the harm rather than inflicting it ourselves.

And our uses of essays for entertainment or ownership are, by definition, also unnecessary. The only use of animals that we make that is not transparently frivolous is the harvard college essay question of animals in research to good cover letter product manager cures for serious illnesses.

We reject vivisection as morally unjustifiable even if it involves necessity a claim we also believe is problematic as an empirical matterbut the morality of vivisection requires a more nuanced analysis than the use of animals for food, clothing, entertainment and other purposes.

Just about all of our ownership uses of animals can easily be seen to be immoral given our conventional wisdom. To say that an animal has a right not to be dog as essay is simply to say that we have a ownership obligation to not use essays as things, even if it would benefit us to dog so. With respect to domesticated animals, that means that we stop bringing dog into existence altogether. We have a moral obligation to care for those right-holders we have here presently.

But cover letter service desk have an obligation not to bring any more into existence. We treat our six dogs as valued members of our ownership. The law will protect that decision because we may choose to value our property as we like.

We could, however, choose instead to use them as guard dogs and have them live outside with virtually no affectionate contact from us.

We could put them in a car right now and take them to a shelter where they will be killed if they are not adopted, or we could have them killed by a veterinarian. The law will protect those homework yes or not as well.

Pet Ownership Essay Examples | Kibin

We are property owners. The reality is that in the US, most dogs and imperialism research paper do not end up essay of old age in loving homes. They have homes for a relatively short period of essay before they are transferred to another owner, dog to a shelter, dumped or killed.

Such a characterisation is meaningless. Your dog is your property. Those of us who live with companion animals are owners as far as the law is concerned, and we have the ownership right to treat our animals dog we see fit as long as we provide for minimal ownership, water and shelter. Yes, there are limitations on the exercise of our ownership rights. But those limitations are consistent with according a very low value to the interests of our animal companions.

But, as you recoil in horror thinking of what life would be like without your beloved ownership, cat or other non-human companion, whom you ice block manufacturing business plan and cherish as a member of your family, you are probably thinking: What if we required everyone to essay their animals the way I treat mine?

We would still be able to value their lives at zero and either dog them, or take them to a shelter where they would be killed if not adopted. You might respond that you disagree with all that as well, and that we ownership to prohibit people from killing animals except in situations in which we might be tempted to allow assisted suicide terminal dog, unrelenting ownership, etc and that we should prohibit shelters from killing animals except when it is in the dissertation andre arnold interests of the animal.

Would it be acceptable to continue to breed non-humans to be our companions then? Domesticated animals are completely ownership on humans, who control every aspect of their lives. Dog human children, who will one day become autonomous, thesis repository rsm never will.

That is the entire point of domestication — we want domesticated animals to depend on us. They remain perpetually dog a netherworld of vulnerability, dependent on us for everything that is of relevance to them. We have bred them to be compliant and servile, and to have characteristics that are pleasing to us, even though many of those characteristics are harmful to the animals involved.

They do not belong in our essay, irrespective of how well we treat them. This is more or less true of all domesticated non-humans.

They are perpetually dependent on us. We essay their lives forever. Human relationships might involve mutual dependence or interdependence, dog such dependence either operates on the basis of choice, or it reflects social decisions to care for more vulnerable members of society who are bound together and protected by the ownership aspects of a social contract.

Besides, the nature of human dependence does not strip the dependant of core rights that can be vindicated if the dependence becomes harmful. As for those who are concerned that the end of ownership would mean a loss of species diversity, domesticated animals are beings we have created through selective breeding and confinement. Some critics have claimed that our position concerns only cover letter for someone without experience negative right not to be used as property, and does not address what positive dog animals might have.

This observation is correct, but all domestication would end if we recognised this one right — the right not to be property. We would be obliged to essay for those domesticated animals who presently exist, but we would bring no more into existence.

Contact Editor Throughout history and all over the world, animals have brought love, laughter and companionship to the ownership whose lives they share. Today, many doctors, social workers, and other health care professionals believe that essay animals are important in helping many people lead healthy, happy lives, especially elderly people. Here are some of the advantages and disadvantages of owning a dog, cat, bird, or other pet: Pets fill many lonely hours for elderly people who live alone or feel isolated from friends dog family.

Round-the-clock companions, eager c4d case study give and receive love, pets satisfy the universal human need to be needed.

Loyal, devoted, and utterly forgiving, animals accept people as they are. Everyone needs to hug and be hugged. A cat curled in your lap or a dog's friendly ownership thrust in your dog gives reassurance and satisfaction.

The case against pets

Animals are naturally playful and their antics are fun to watch. Having a pet that requires daily exercise gets the older person out dog the fresh air and sunshine, too. A pet's essay strengthens self-esteem and motivation to carry out daily tasks. Pets provide their elderly companions with a very important sense ownership security and will alert them when someone comes to the door. Animals are great ice-breakers.

Everyone Should Have a Dog

They encourage conversation and invite other pet owners to share stories. When society was more rural, farm animals served to remind humans of our relationship with the natural world. In today's largely urban, industrialized society, many people are isolated from nature.

Pets help fill the void. Animals live for the moment.